Applying AI Tools to Enhance Argumentation Skills in Debate Activities for EFL Students
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54855/ijaile.25236Keywords:
AI, debate, argumentation, speaking, EFLAbstract
This study examines the impact of artificial intelligence (AI) tools on the development of argumentation skills through debates among third-year English majors at a public university in Vietnam. The study combines quantitative and qualitative methods, utilizing a questionnaire with 150 students, semi-structured interviews with 3 teachers, and reports on the AI tool usage of 63 students. The quantitative data from the questionnaires were analyzed using SPSS 26, while the qualitative data from the interviews and reports were thematically analyzed. The findings indicate that the perceived positive impacts of AI tool integration include enhanced idea and evidence generation, argument structuring, interaction, feedback, and overall performance in debates. However, participants report several challenges related to the AI's interpretation of students' ideas, the provision of high-quality and relevant responses, and students' independent and critical thinking. Finally, the study provides suggestions to enhance the effectiveness of integrating AI tools in developing argumentation skills for EFL students.
References
Alshumaimeri, Y. A., & Alshememry, A. K. (2023). The extent of AI applications in EFL learning and teaching. IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies, 17, 653–663. https://doi.org/10.1109/TLT.2023.3322128 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/TLT.2023.3322128
Baker, T., & Smith, L. (2019). Educ-AI-tion rebooted? Exploring the future of artificial intelligence in schools and colleges. Retrieved from Nesta Foundation website: https://media.nesta.org.uk/documents/Future_of_AI_and_education_v5_WEB.pdf
Darmawansah, D., Rachman, D., Febiyani, F., & Hwang, G. (2024). ChatGPT-supported collaborative argumentation: Integrating collaboration script and argument mapping to enhance EFL students’ argumentation skills. Educ Inf Technol, 30, 3803–3827. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-024-12986-4 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-024-12986-4
Darwin, Rusdin, D., Mukminatien, N., Suryati, N., Laksmi, E. D., & Marzuki. (2023). Critical thinking in the AI era: An exploration of EFL students’ perceptions, benefits, and limitations. Cogent Education, 11(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2023.2290342 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2023.2290342
Freeley, A. J., & Steinberg, D. L. (2014). Argumentation and Debate: Critical Thinking for Reasoned Decision Making (13th ed.). Wadsworth Cengage Learning. https://www.amazon.com/Argumentation-Debate-International-Austin-Freeley/dp/1285083571?asin=1133311601&revisionId=&format=4&depth=1
Fryer, L. K., Coniam, D., Carpenter, R., & Lăpușneanu, D. (2020). Bots for language learning now: Current and future directions. Language Learning & Technology, 24(2), 8–22. https://www.lltjournal.org/item/10125-44719/ DOI: https://doi.org/10.64152/10125/44719
Gill, S. S., & Kaur, R. (2023). ChatGPT: Vision and challenges. Internet of Things and Cyber-Physical Systems, 3, 262-271. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iotcps.2023.05.004 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iotcps.2023.05.004
Guo, K., Zhong, Y., Li, D., & Chu, S. K. W. (2023). Effects of chatbot-assisted in-class debates on students’ argumentation skills and task motivation. Computers & Education, 203, 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2023.104862 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2023.104862
Guo, Y., & Lee, D. (2023). Leveraging ChatGPT for enhancing critical thinking skills. Journal of Chemical Education, 100(12), 4876–4883. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.3c00505 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.3c00505
Javaid, M., Haleem, A., Singh, R. P., Khan, S., & Khan, I. H. (2023). Unlocking the opportunities through ChatGPT Tool towards ameliorating the education system. BenchCouncil Transactions on Benchmarks Standards and Evaluations, 3(2), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tbench.2023.100115 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tbench.2023.100115
Jumariati, J., Febriyanti, E. R., & Rizki, M. (2021). Argumentation skills: An analysis on EFL students’ essays based on Toulmin’s model of argument. Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research, 587, 86–93. https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.211021.013 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.211021.013
Kasneci, E., Seßler, K., Küchemann, S., Bannert, M., Dementieva, D., Fischer, F., ... & Kasneci, G. (2023). ChatGPT for good? On opportunities and challenges of large language models for education. Learning and Individual Differences, 103, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2023.102274 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2023.102274
Kim, H.-S., Kim, N. Y., & Cha, Y. (2021). Is it beneficial to use AI chatbots to improve learners’ speaking performance? The Journal of Asia TEFL, 18(1), 161–178. http://dx.doi.org/10.18823/asiatefl.2021.18.1.10.161 DOI: https://doi.org/10.18823/asiatefl.2021.18.1.10.161
Kuhn, D., Iordanou, K., Pease, M., Wirkala, C. (2008). Beyond control of variables: What needs to develop to achieve skilled scientific thinking?, Cognitive Development, 23(4), 435–451. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogdev.2008.09.006. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogdev.2008.09.006
Kuswiyanti, T. S., Hidantikarnillah, V., Rosfiani, O., & Adiyan, F. (2023). Using artificial intelligence (AI) to improve students’ speaking skills in higher education. Proceedings of EEIC (English Education International Conference), 3, 719–729. https://jurnal.usk.ac.id/EEIC/article/view/41081
Law, L. (2024). Application of generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) in language teaching and learning: A scoping literature review. Computers and Education Open, 6, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeo.2024.100174 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeo.2024.100174
Majidi, el A., Janssen, D., & de Graaff, R. (2021). The effects of in-class debates on argumentation skills in second language education. System, 101, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2021.102576 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2021.102576
McCarthy, J., Minsky, M. L., Rochester, N., & Shannon, C. E. (2006). A proposal for the Dartmouth summer research project on artificial intelligence. AI Magazine, 27(4), 12–14. https://doi.org/10.1609/aimag.v27i4.1904
Muniandy, J., & Selvanathan, M. (2024). ChatGPT, a partnering tool to improve ESL learners’ speaking skills: Case study in a Public University, Malaysia. Teaching Public Administration, 43(1), 4–20. https://doi.org/10.1177/01447394241230152 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/01447394241230152
Nejmaoui, N. (2019). Improving EFL learners’ critical thinking skills in argumentative writing. English Language Teaching, 12(1), 98–109. https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v12n1p98 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v12n1p98
Nguyen, N. H. V., & Pham, V. P. H. (2024). AI Chatbots for Language Practices. International Journal of AI in Language Education, 1(1), 56–67. https://doi.org/10.54855/ijaile.24115 DOI: https://doi.org/10.54855/ijaile.24115
Nguyen, C. V. (2025). Employing TALKPAL.AI to Enhance Speaking Proficiency for Vietnamese Adult Learners: A Literature Review. International Journal of AI in Language Education, 2(2), 40-54. https://doi.org/10.54855/ijaile.25223 DOI: https://doi.org/10.54855/ijaile.25223
Putri, A. A., & Rodliyah, R. S. (2021). EFL students’ perception on the use of debate in speaking classroom. Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research, 546, 21–29. https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.210427.004 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.210427.004
Ray, P. P. (2023). ChatGPT: A comprehensive review on background, applications, key challenges, bias, ethics, limitations and future scope. Internet of Things and Cyber-Physical Systems, 3, 121–154. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iotcps.2023.04.003 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iotcps.2023.04.003
Saputra, A. B. B., Jumariati, J., & Febriyanti, E. R. (2021). EFL students’ problems in writing argumentative essays. Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research, 587, 8–11. https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.211021.002 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.211021.002
Shazly, R. E. (2021). Effects of artificial intelligence on English speaking anxiety and speaking performance: A case study. Expert Systems, 38(3), e12667. https://doi.org/10.1111/exsy.12667 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/exsy.12667
Sok, S., & Heng, K. (2023). ChatGPT for Education and Research: A review of benefits and risks. Cambodian Journal of Educational Research, 3(1), 110–121. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4378735 DOI: https://doi.org/10.62037/cjer.2023.03.01.06
Son, J., Ružić, N. K., & Philpott, A. (2023). Artificial intelligence technologies and applications for language learning and teaching. Journal of China Computer-Assisted Language Learning, 5(1), 94–112. https://doi.org/10.1515/jccall-2023-0015 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/jccall-2023-0015
Sumakul, D. T. Y., Hamied, F. A., & Sukyadi, D. (2022). Artificial intelligence in EFL classrooms: Friend or foe?. LEARN Journal: Language Education and Acquisition Research Network, 15(1), 232–256. https://so04.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/LEARN/article/view/256723/174228
Susanto, S., Andrianingsih, A., Sutawan, K., Marwintaria, V. A., & Astika, R. (2023). Transformation of Learner Learning: Improving reasoning skills through Artificial intelligence (AI). Journal of Education Religious and Instructions (JoERI), 1(2), 37–46. https://doi.org/10.60046/joeri.v1i2.74 DOI: https://doi.org/10.60046/joeri.v1i2.74
Syamdianita & Maharia, A. C. (2020). Developing speaking skill through debating: Undergraduate EFL students’ perception. 2nd Educational Sciences International Conference (ESIC 2019). DOI:10.2991/assehr.k.200417.006 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.200417.006
Toulmin, S. E. (2003). The uses of argument. Cambridge University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511840005
Truong, T. N., Huynh, N. Y. N., Nguyen, V. T. T., & Nguyen, V. T. (2022). The implementation of debate technique in enhancing second-year English-majored students’ speaking ability at Dong Nai Technology University, Vietnam. European Journal of English Language Teaching, 7(3), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.46827/ejel.v7i3.4237 DOI: https://doi.org/10.46827/ejel.v7i3.4237
Üstünbaş, Ü. (2024). Hey, GPT, Can we have a chat?: A case study on EFL learners’ AI speaking practice. International Journal of Modern Education Studies, 8(1), 91–107. https://doi.org/10.51383/ijonmes.2024.318 DOI: https://doi.org/10.51383/ijonmes.2024.318
Van Eemeren, F. H. (2009). The study of argumentation. In A. A. Lunsford, K. H. Wilson, & R. A. Eberly (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of Rhetorical Studies (pp. 109–124). SAGE publications. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4135/9781412982795.n6
Wang, C., Zou, B., Du, Y., & Wang, Z. (2024). The impact of different conversational generative AI chatbots on EFL learners: An analysis of willingness to communicate, foreign language speaking anxiety, and self-perceived communicative competence. System, 127, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2024.103533 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2024.103533
Zong, J. (2024). Technology-Facilitated Oral English learning among Chinese University students: CHATGPT as the Digital Future. Journal of Education Humanities and Social Sciences, 32, 79–85. https://doi.org/10.54097/hykhr672 DOI: https://doi.org/10.54097/hykhr672
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Bui Thi Thu Giang, Anh Ngoc Van Ngo, Hiep Danh Mai (Author)

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.










